Difference Between Community Property With Rights of Survivorship vs. Joint Tenancy
By Andrine Redsteer
Property held as a joint tenancy and property held as community property with rights of survivorship have many similar characteristics. When a married couple owns property as a joint tenancy or as community property with rights of survivorship, the spouse who outlives the other automatically receives the deceased spouse's property interest. However, the two types of ownership differ regarding how each is taxed upon the death of a spouse.
When a married couple owns property as a joint tenancy, both spouses share equal ownership interests in the entire property. For example, if a married couple owns a home as joint tenants, each has a 50 percent interest in the home. However, these interests are undivided. This means that each spouse is entitled to use the entire property and the interests cannot be split up. When property is held as a joint tenancy it includes a right of survivorship. Thus, when one spouse dies, his interest automatically passes to his surviving spouse. The surviving spouse is then left with a 100 percent share of the property.
Community Property Basics
There are nine states that recognize community property: Arizona, Idaho, Louisiana, Texas, Wisconsin, Nevada, Washington, New Mexico and California. In these states, marital property is viewed as belonging to each spouse equally. Each spouse has a right to pass on his share to whomever he wishes in a last will and testament. This differs from property owned as a joint tenancy in that neither spouse can pass their share to anyone but the other spouse. In a community property state, a spouse is typically entitled to some of the community property when the other spouse dies without a will dependent on whether there are children and if they are the children of the surviving spouse.
Community Property With Rights of Survivorship
Some community property states allow married couples to hold property as community property with right of survivorship. When community property is held this way, the surviving spouse is certain to receive the deceased spouse's share. In other words, spouses are not allowed to "bequeath," or pass, their shares of the community property to someone other than her spouse in a will.
Taxes on Profits
One main difference between property held as a joint tenancy and property held as community property with right of survivorship is the manner in which profits from the sale of jointly-held property is taxed. Generally, property held as community property with right of survivorship has tax advantages over a joint tenancy. In a joint tenancy, when one spouse sells property that was held jointly prior to the death of the other spouse, a portion of the profit is subject to capital gains tax. Whereas, community property with right of survivorship is not subject to capital gains tax when sold.
Parties who are not married may hold property as a joint tenancy. For example, a brother and a sister may inherit property as a joint tenancy from their parents. However, community property with the right of survivorship exists only in a marital or registered domestic partnership context.
- Colorado Bar Association: Joint Tenancy
- Internal Revenue Service: Basic Principles of Community Property Law
- FreeAdvice: What Is Community Property?
- Peoria-Real-Estate-Info.com: Is Community Property With the Right of Survivorship Right for You?
- Golden Gate University: Community Property With Right of Survivorship - What Is It, and Why Use It?
- Washington Probate Avoidance: Income Tax Advantage of Community Property -"Double Step Up in Basis" Rule
- National Center for Lesbian Rights: The California Domestic Partnership Law - What It Means for You and Your Family
Andrine Redsteer's writing on tribal gaming has been published in "The Guardian" and she continues to write about reservation economic development. Redsteer holds a Bachelor of Arts in history from the University of Washington, a Master of Arts in Native American studies from Montana State University and a Juris Doctor from Seattle University School of Law.