Can a Parent That Abandons His Family Get Visitation Rights?
By Teo Spengler
Updated March 30, 2020
Abandonment means different things in different contexts. Sometimes one parent reacts immaturely to marital problems by running away from home and staying away. Although those left behind will regard this behavior as abandonment, a court will likely determine that some type of visitation is in the long-term best interests of the child. A parent convicted of criminal child abandonment will have a more difficult time winning visitation rights.
Child Custody and Visitation
When a marriage ends, arguments about custody and visitation of the children can begin. A child can only live at one home at a time so each parent will likely see less of the child than did during the marriage. While physical custody generally refers to the children's living arrangements after a divorce, visitation describes the time that a parent who does not have custody gets to spend with his kids. If a divorce decree does not mention visitation, the law presumes that the noncustodial parent is entitled to reasonable visitation, and only if the judge specifically orders no visitation is a parent denied the right to see his children.
Factors for Visitation Rights
State statutes vary regarding custody and visitation, but most make the best interests of the children the central factor in resolving these issues. The best interests of a child depend on her age as well as the family history. Generally, courts adhere to the principal that it is good for children to know and spend time with both parents, so visitation is almost always granted absent factors that suggest it would be harmful to the children. The court can tailor visitation rights to suit the circumstances or deny visitation when appropriate. Some type of visitation arrangement is generally awarded even if the parent has been absent for a long time because parents inherently possess the right to attempt to repair the parent-child relationship.
Read More: How to Take Visitation Rights Away From a Parent
Types of Visitation
The court often sets up a detailed schedule for visitation, specifying which parent will have the children for weekends and holidays throughout the year. This prevents parental bickering and gives all parties a chance to plan around the schedule. A general order for reasonable visitation only works when parents are on amicable terms and cooperating. Sometimes the court orders supervised visitation, which means that the parent can see his children but only in the presence of another adult. Courts may award this type of visitation when a parent has been missing from the children's lives for a long enough period that they require time to get to know one another. The parent who has been out of contact with his children for months or years is a good candidate for supervised visitation.
A court may deny visitation if it determines that the child could be harmed by any contact with the parent. Essentially, this constitutes a finding that the best interests of the child is not to have any interaction whatsoever with that parent. For example, if a parent has a history of physically or emotionally abusing a child, a judge may well deny visitation rights. The fact that a parent has been incarcerated or convicted of a crime does not necessarily doom a request for visitation; all factors are considered before the court makes the determination.
If you have been convicted of criminal child abandonment, your chances of visitation depend upon the nature of the offense. Criminal child abandonment can be a felony or a misdemeanor. States vary widely in the types of behavior that are included in this offense; it can include anything from leaving the children alone at home with an elder sibling while the parent goes to work, to leaving an infant in a garbage can, to child abuse. A court will likely look at the facts leading to the abandonment conviction before making a decision about visitation.
Teo Spengler earned a J.D. from U.C. Berkeley's Boalt Hall. As an Assistant Attorney General in Juneau, she practiced before the Alaska Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court before opening a plaintiff's personal injury practice in San Francisco. She holds both an M.A. and an M.F.A in creative writing and enjoys writing legal blogs and articles. Her work has appeared in numerous online publications including USA Today, Legal Zoom, eHow Business, Livestrong, SF Gate, Go Banking Rates, Arizona Central, Houston Chronicle, Navy Federal Credit Union, Pearson, Quicken.com, TurboTax.com, and numerous attorney websites. Spengler splits her time between the French Basque Country and Northern California.