What Is a Prove-Up Hearing in the Divorce Process?
By Teo Spengler
Jupiterimages, Creatas Images/Creatas/Getty Images
It takes two to tango, but sometimes only one to obtain a divorce. When only one spouse files papers in a divorce action, the court may grant a default divorce judgment generally on the terms requested by the filing spouse. Some courts require that party to appear to establish some of the essential facts before entering the final divorce judgment. A similar hearing may be required in any uncontested divorce proceeding. This is called a "prove-up" hearing in some states.
Default vs. Uncontested Divorce
All default divorces are uncontested divorces, but not all uncontested divorces are defaults. A default divorce decree is awarded when one spouse has divorce papers served on the other as required by law, but the second spouse does not file a response with the court within the statutory period. By failing to appear, that spouse loses his opportunity to contest the divorce petition. A divorce can also be uncontested if the spouses work out the terms of an agreement between themselves and submit it to the court for approval.
Read More: Divorce by Default
Default Divorce Procedure
A divorce proceeding is court litigation; the party filing for divorce must inform her spouse about the proceeding to give him the opportunity to appear and present evidence and legal arguments. If the deadline passes without a response, the litigating spouse must file papers advising the court that the other spouse was served with notice of the divorce according to the laws of the jurisdiction; that he failed to submit a response; and that the deadline has passed. In many states, the filing spouse must also give the court a proposed judgment setting out the terms she is seeking. The court can order a hearing to request documentation of her claims.
Prove-Up in Default Divorce
The prove-up procedure in a default divorce varies among states. Commonly, evidence at the hearing will be recorded by the court reporter, and courts generally require evidence that the other party was properly served and that he is not in the military. Judges also have jurisdiction to ask for proof of any claims the moving spouse has made. In some states, like Texas, the laws specify that the court cannot automatically accept as true the allegations made in the divorce petition even though the respondent failed to answer. In default hearings in those states, the spouse must present evidence to support all claims she raised in the petition. Sometimes judges expect the moving party to establish that basic requirements for a divorce action have been met, such as state residency, jurisdiction and venue requirements. But in other jurisdictions, the default, or prove-up, hearing is very brief -- little more than a rubber-stamp procedure.
Prove-Up in Settlement
When the parties negotiate a mutual agreement that resolves such issues as property and debt distribution, child custody or spousal support, they submit the agreement to the court for approval. State procedures vary; different jurisdictions may prefer that the agreement be framed as a settlement agreement, stipulated judgment or agreed final decree of divorce. In any event, the prove-up hearing on an agreement is generally a truncated one. In some states, only one party must show up in court. In others, neither party needs to appear. The judge simply uses the prove-up hearing time to read the documents the spouses signed and filed. On rare occasions when fraud is suspected, a court may require evidence backing up the parties' claims, but generally, the points of proof are limited to the state's standard divorce requirements.
- Dallas Bar Association: Preparing for and Handling Prove-Ups
- The Wright Firm: What Is This Divorce Prove-Up I Keep Hearing About?
- Clark County Family Law Self-Help Center: Divorce Brochure
- U.S.Legal.com: Prove Up Law and Legal Definition
- Sylvester Law Firm: The 11 Stages of Divorce in Chicago That You Must Know About
Teo Spengler earned a J.D. from U.C. Berkeley's Boalt Hall. As an Assistant Attorney General in Juneau, she practiced before the Alaska Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court before opening a plaintiff's personal injury practice in San Francisco. She holds both an M.A. and an M.F.A in creative writing and enjoys writing legal blogs and articles. Her work has appeared in numerous online publications including USA Today, Legal Zoom, eHow Business, Livestrong, SF Gate, Go Banking Rates, Arizona Central, Houston Chronicle, Navy Federal Credit Union, Pearson, Quicken.com, TurboTax.com, and numerous attorney websites. Spengler splits her time between the French Basque Country and Northern California.